Ten Minutes of Torahwith Rabbi Chaim Weiner
Vayetze – 5767
|
|
ANSWERS TO LAST WEEK’S QUESTIONS: 1. Why does the Midrash [and Rashi who follows the Midrash]
offer alternative explanations for why Isaac goes blind, rather than the
simple interpretation - the cause of his blindness was old age? The
language of the verse is awkward. Instead of simply saying ‘his eyes were dim’
it uses the phrase – ‘his eyes were dim from seeing’. This suggests that it
is more than simple blindness. 2. What is the meaning of ‘seeing’ in each these
interpretations? According
to the first interpretation, ‘seeing’ is taken literally - Isaac was
literally blind. The Midrash reads the verse as saying – Isaacs’s eyes were
dimmed [by God] to prevent him from seeing [Esau’s wickedness]. According
to the second interpretation, Isaac could see, but he was blind to his son’s behavior as a result of the trauma of his childhood. Seeing
means ‘perceiving’. 3. Explain the idea conveyed by the second interpretation? The second interpretation is saying that our personal
history affects the way we see the world. There are some childhood traumas we
never recover from. The Akeidah made it impossible
for Isaac to correctly assess his son’s behaviour. |
|
|
|
|
______________________________________________________________
|
Ten Minutes of Torah was prepared by Rabbi Chaim
Weiner, based on the methods of Prof. Nechama Leibowitz. Rabbi Weiner studied and corresponded with
Prof. Leibowitz for several years. ·
I endeavour to reply to everyone
who sends their answers to me. ·
Please feel free to forward this
study sheet to anyone who you think might be interested, including all
headers and footers. ·
This study sheet, and archives of
previous study sheets are available at www.tenminutesoftorah.supanet.com . ·
Please send any comments or
questions (including technical questions, or problems you have accessing the
material) to tenminutesoftorah@supanet.com. |